[…] https://www.americaspace.com/2025/02/28/a-comprehensive-guide-to-nasas-simultaneous-clps-missions/ […]
from Comments for AmericaSpace https://ift.tt/Wzj9fJK
via World Space Info
Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.
Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.
Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.
Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.
Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.
[…] https://www.americaspace.com/2025/02/28/a-comprehensive-guide-to-nasas-simultaneous-clps-missions/ […]
I’d prefer the SLS cores go to Interstellar Probe paid for by killing Lunar Starship.
I don’t want one dime of my taxes going to the New Spaz movement.
[…] https://www.americaspace.com/2025/02/28/a-comprehensive-guide-to-nasas-simultaneous-clps-missions/ […]
[…] mission to attempt a lunar landing in 2025 will be Firefly Aerospace’s Blue Ghost. As we reported in detail, Blue Ghost’s flight began with a flawless launch on January 15th. The spacecraft’s […]
Two lunar landers from NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services will explore the Moon simultaneously during the first half of March. We break down the milestones which are expected to take place over the next three weeks.
The post A Comprehensive Guide to NASA’s Simultaneous Commercial Lunar Missions first appeared on AmericaSpace.
In reply to Alex Longo.
Hi Alex, Perhaps the “clean room” around the SRB joints is more for temperature control than dust elimination.
The cost of flying Artemis 2 : .. Could be huge. No one has any incentive to do it quickly or cheaply. Orion, SLS & EGS are costing ~ $ 3 Bn/yr ? and it’ll be at least 12 months until Artemis 2 launches, but could be over 24 months.
“Stack” and “launch” sounds cheap but there is a huge amount of testing during and after assembly, with an army of thousands on standby. Artemis 2 won’t achieve anything significant, but puts astronaut’s lives at risk.
Some would argue that if NASA continue and launch Artemis 2, they should also do Artemis 3 (to achieve the lunar landing) but that would be another huge expense for a publicity stunt that doesn’t help sustainable long term operations on the moon.
Lunar Gateway might as well be cancelled as well. It was never needed for lunar ops, just a practice for travel to Mars, and another reason to build and
The armies of people working on Gateway, Orion, SLS & EGS could develop payloads and spacecraft for Falcon Heavy, Starship and New Glenn to launch.
Best wishes to all – especially in Ukraine.
In reply to Rodney Price.
Hi Rodney,
Thanks for your interest in these Artemis stories. I feel like I have seen your name in the article comments a few times now.
I do not know the exact reason why they need to protect the booster from small contaminants, but I cannot see any other reason to go through all the effort of building a cleanroom the boosters every time they integrate two segments. My guess is that they are worried about the field joints between the segments, which are more vulnerable than the rest of the booster and critical to mission success (as tragically illustrated by Challenger). I put a brief description of this type of joint, as well as a diagram, into this article:
https://www.americaspace.com/2024/11/26/artemis-2-stacking-begins-as-heat-shield-decision-looms/
NASA has not disclosed the remaining cost of flying Artemis 2, but I would estimate that it is in the low hundreds of millions of dollars rather than the billions. All of the hardware is complete. Even Orion, which was the pacing item for two years, just needs its solar array wings. They just need to pay for the labor required to stack the components and launch. Safely disposing of all this hardware (especially the SRBs, which are full of explosive and caustic solid propellant) would probably cost as much as flying it. Regardless of how Isaacman et al. decide to move forward with Artemis, I would strongly encourage them to go ahead with this flight.
The FTS sounds dangerous, but without the batteries which power it, it is no more dangerous than the propellant inside the SRBs. It needs an electric current to ignite. Like any other plastic explosive, it is relatively safe to handle, so long as you know what you are doing. Installing it separately just saves time and money. Shortly before they roll out for launch, they will arm the FTS by installing the batteries.
Best regards,
Alex
Strange that such huge booster segments could be jeopardised by dust or even a strand of human hair.
” The cost of flying the mission, in both dollars and man-hours, is relatively low,” – Only a few $ billion more then ?
Interesting that they install the FTS explosives before slotting core between boosters.
[…] completed in December. As a whole, the conclusions were positive. As AmericaSpace’s Jim Hillhouse recounted in detail, NASA is confident that they can tweak Orion’s trajectory during reentry and minimize the risk to […]
Last week, NASA completed the Solid Rocket Boosters for Artemis 2. This article on the recent progress towards the next lunar mission features Jeff Seibert's recent photographs of these titanic rocket motors.
The post NASA Completes Mighty Solid Rocket Boosters for Artemis 2 first appeared on AmericaSpace.
[…] Ghost’s framework was beginning to resemble a lunar lander. Last August, it was shipped to NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), which placed it inside a vacuum chamber and tested its reliability in the harsh thermal […]
Two weeks after its launch, Firefly's Blue Ghost lander is performing well. During its cruise to the Moon, the spacecraft has utilized its scientific payloads and captured imagery of Earth and a solar eclipse.
The post Blue Ghost Lander Progresses Through Checkouts first appeared on AmericaSpace.
In September of 2013, the simmering rivalry between entrepreneurs Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk reached a fever pitch. NASA’s historic Launch Complex 39A, the launch pad for Apollo 11, was no longer needed, and the agency decided to transfer it to a commercial firm. Musk’s SpaceX and Bezos’ Blue Origin both submitted proposals to renovate the hallowed site. Musk was […]
The post Blue Origin Achieves Orbit With New Glenn first appeared on AmericaSpace.
[…] service, however, Blue Origin fell behind its self-declared rival, SpaceX. To date, SpaceX has launched nearly 450 Falcon rockets into orbit, and it has successfully landed 375 first-stage boosters. With a maximum speed of Mach […]
Blue Origin is scheduled to launch its first New Glenn rocket at 1:30 AM EST on January 8th. We recount the history of the company, its vision, and the long journey required to reach this milestone.
The post After 25 Years of Work, Blue Origin Stands Ready for New Glenn Debut first appeared on AmericaSpace.
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has been devastated by California's Eaton Fire. We urge you to donate to the JPL Disaster Relief Fund, which is linked at the end of this appeal.
The post JPL Creates Relief Fund for Team Members Impacted by Eaton Fire first appeared on AmericaSpace.