This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Ad 1

Friday 30 September 2022

SpaceX, NASA studying commercial crew mission to Hubble Space Telescope

The Hubble Space Telescope in the payload bay of space shuttle Atlantis during the last servicing mission in May 2009. Credit: NASA

NASA and SpaceX will study the potential use of a commercial Dragon crew spacecraft to reboost and service the Hubble Space Telescope, a 32-year-old observatory last upgraded by a space shuttle in 2009, officials announced Thursday.

The study will explore the the technical feasibility of using a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft to dock with Hubble, currently orbiting more than 330 miles (530 kilometers) above Earth. Once docked, the Dragon capsule’s propulsion system could raise Hubble’s altitude to delay the telescope’s eventual re-entry back into the atmosphere. Engineers will also examine ways to use the Dragon spacecraft with astronauts to service Hubble.

“A few months ago, SpaceX approached NASA with the idea for a study whether a commercial crew could help reboost our Hubble spacecraft into a higher orbit, one that would extend its additional lifetime,” said Thomas Zurbuchen, head of NASA’s science mission directorate. “Today, we’re announcing that we have signed a Space Act Agreement with SpaceX to produce a feasibility study of exactly that, as well as some other tools that may be coming to bear, really what the benefits and risks would be to having a private team help support one of NASA’s science missions.”

Hubble launched on NASA’s space shuttle Discovery in April 1990, and was designed for servicing in orbit. Five more space shuttle missions upgraded, repaired, and reboosted Hubble, fixing the telescope’s blurred vision and adding new science instruments. The last servicing mission was in 2009, and NASA retired the space shuttle fleet in 2011 after completing assembly of the International Space Station.

There’s no guarantee the six-month feasibility study will lead to a mission to Hubble.

“The main goal of this study is going to be technical,” said Jessica Jensen, SpaceX’s vice president of customer operations and integration. “Is it even technically feasible to do this with a Dragon spacecraft?”

“Predominately, on the SpaceX side, we’re going to be looking at Dragon capabilities and how they would need to be modified to safely rendezvous and dock with Hubble. So details of exactly physically how that’s done, and how we also safely do that from a trajectory point of view, that’s all to be worked out,” Jensen said.

The Polaris Program, a private human spaceflight initiative led by billionaire businessman Jared Isaacman, is also part of the Hubble mission study with SpaceX and NASA.

“Polaris is excited to assist in this study, and hopefully it does lead us down a path that ensures Hubble’s ability to continue to serve science for decades into the future,” Isaacman said Thursday.

Isaacman, an experienced fighter jet pilot, flew in space for three days last September on a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft. He commanded the Inspiration4 mission with three crewmates, the first all-private crew mission to low Earth orbit without any government involvement.

The Polaris Program, announced earlier this year, will include three more commercial astronaut missions flying on SpaceX rockets. The first mission, designated Polaris Dawn, is scheduled for launch no earlier than next March, with a four-person crew that will attempt the first commercial spacewalk in orbit using a modified Dragon spacecraft.

Isaacman’s Inspiration4 mission last year reached an altitude of 366 miles (590 kilometers), the highest anyone has flown since the space shuttle missions to Hubble. The International Space Station flies lower, around 260 miles (420 kilometers) above Earth’s surface.

The Polaris Dawn mission with go even higher than Inspiration4, targeting a peak altitude of about 870 miles (1,400 kilometers). That will exceed the altitude reached by NASA’s Gemini 11 mission in 1966, which set the altitude record for an astronaut flight in Earth orbit at 853 miles (1,372 kilometers), according to NASA.

Isaacman and SpaceX have not disclosed details about the second Polaris mission, other than it would fly on another Dragon spacecraft. The third Polaris mission will be a crew flight on SpaceX’s huge next-generation Starship rocket.

Assuming the NASA-SpaceX feasibility study shows that a Dragon servicing mission to Hubble is possible, Isaacman said it would be a “logical second mission” for the Polaris Program.

“When we were giving consideration to what we could accomplish on the first Polaris mission, and what that could lead us to for a second mission, the idea of potentially a Hubble servicing mission was one of the ideas up for consideration,” Isaacman said.

Jared Isaacman commanded the three-day Inspiration4 mission on SpaceX’s Crew Dragon Resilience spacecraft in September 2021, flying to an altitude of 367 miles (590 kilometers), higher than any humans since space shuttle servicing missions to the Hubble Space Telescope. Credit: Inspiration4

SpaceX and NASA are self-funding their own work on the joint feasibility study, which will also assess the cost of a SpaceX servicing mission to Hubble, and determine when it might be ready for launch.

John Grunsfeld, a former NASA astronaut who flew on three space shuttle servicing flights to Hubble, tweeted: “It’s about time we get serious about keeping Hubble doing. Big smile.”

The space shuttle had an airlock to support multiple spacewalks on each mission, and a large payload bay the size of a school bus, allowing it to haul tons of cargo to service Hubble. Dragon is not designed with an airlock, and the entire crew cabin will be depressurized during the spacewalk on Isaacman’s Polaris Dawn mission next year. The commercial astronauts on Polaris Dawn will wear new spacesuits designed by SpaceX to keep the crew members alive during the spacewalk.

SpaceX’s Dragon capsule has a trunk section that could allow it to haul limited cargo to Hubble, but it doesn’t have a robotic arm like the shuttle, which reached out to grapple Hubble and bring it to the shuttle’s payload bay.

“As we start this study, I think we’re starting at a point that is not at the level of sophistication in our experience base that we were at the end of the shuttle era,” Zurbuchen said. “Each one of the lessons, even if it was possible in the past will have to be regained with new technology and new partnerships. In other words, don’t expect what we did the last time.”

Nevertheless, each SpaceX Dragon mission is less expensive than a shuttle flight. NASA said the study with SpaceX is “non-exclusive,” and other companies may propose similar similar studies with different rockets or spacecraft as their model.

Northrop Grumman said earlier this year it is working on a similar unsolicited proposal to NASA to send a robotic servicing spacecraft the Chandra X-ray Observatory, another aging NASA science mission that orbits in a much higher orbit than Earth currently inaccessible by a crew mission.

Jensen, a SpaceX manager, said one of possible outcomes of the Hubble servicing mission study is that a robotic spacecraft might be a better fit for the job.

“There could be something that comes out of this study that says, ‘Hey, it does not make sense to have a human mission going to do this,'” Jensen said. “So we’re going to look at all the different options.

“We want to benefit Hubble. If benefiting Hubble is not just boosting it, but also providing some servicing, and that can be done with a human spaceflight missions, all the better,” Jensen said. “So it’s all on the table right now, and as we get to the study, we will have to figure out some of these things and see what’s possible.”

The Hubble Space Telescope has outlived its original design life, largely thanks to the space shuttle servicing missions, but still produces top-notch science. The James Webb Space Telescope launched last year has a primary mirror with a collecting area more than six times that of Hubble, making it the largest telescope ever sent into space.

Webb is designed to detect faint infrared light, giving it the ability to see galaxies farther away and further back in time than Hubble can see, allowing astronomers to study the aftermath of the Big Bang more than 13 billion years ago. But Hubble still has scientific utility, with instruments sensitive to visible and ultraviolet light, different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum than Webb is tuned to study.

“Hubble is more exciting than ever because now it is a complementary asset next to the James Webb Space Telescope with a different frequency range and a different viewpoint,” Zurbuchen said.

File photo of the Hubble Space Telescope following its release from the shuttle Atlantis in May 2009. Credit: NASA

Patrick Crouse, Hubble’s project manager at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, said the observatory is likely to remain operational through the late 2020s or early 2030s. Regardless of how well Hubble’s instruments and spacecraft components hold up, the observatory is gradually losing altitude due to aerodynamic drag. That has a 50% chance of causing Hubble to re-enter the atmosphere and burn up by 2037, Crouse said.

“We’re excited to be looking at new innovative ways to keep our mission at the forefront of the scientific discovery,” Crouse said. “We will ensure that the feasibility study addresses Hubble safety throughout any sort of servicing or boosting scenarios that the study will consider.”

Hubble’s altitude has dropped about 18 miles (30 kilometers) since the last shuttle servicing mission in 2009. Boosting Hubble’s orbit to more than 370 miles, or close to 600 kilometers, would effectively keep the telescope in orbit an additional 15 to 20 years, Crouse said.

But Hubble’s orbital altitude is just one factor in how long the mission will remain operational.

One of the items engineers watch most closely on Hubble is the health of the spacecraft’s gyroscopes, which measure the direction and rate of the spacecraft’s movement when it turns to point toward distant galaxies, stars, and planets to collect scientific data and imagery. Astronauts on the last shuttle servicing mission replaced all six gyros on Hubble, and three remain operational.

The three gyros still working are an enhanced design, and Crouse said engineers expect them to keep working for “quite a while.” Hubble was originally designed to require at least three gyros for regular operations. Engineers have devised ways to continue some of the telescope’s scientific work with just one gyro, but that would come with limitations in where Hubble could point to make astronomical observations.

The primary motor to open and shut the aperture door to Hubble’s primary mirror also failed last year. But the telescope has a backup motor for the door, which is working, and the door is expected to remain open at all times unless Hubble goes into safe mode.

“We do see wear and tear, so it’s really just ongoing aging of the spacecraft components, electrical parts,” Crouse said. “We have reliability models that we look at … and of course we work very hard every day to try to mitigate aging scenarios with the spacecraft.

“So we won’t last forever, but we’re trying to last as long as we can,” he said. “We have reasonable expectations to be able to operate productively through the end of this decade and into the next decade, we believe.”

Astronauts on the last shuttle flight to Hubble installed a capture ring to the aft bulkhead of the observatory to aid in the docking of a new-generation spacecraft to safely de-orbit and dispose of the telescope at the end of its mission. NASA wants to ensure debris from Hubble, which measures 43.5 feet (13.3 meters) long, doesn’t fall over populated areas during re-entry.

The 6-foot-diameter (1.8-meter) soft capture ring could also assist in the docking of SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft, giving the approaching capsule a place to latch to the telescope.

“The soft capture mechanism certainly makes a mission like this much more feasible and easier to talk about,” Crouse said. “And that will certainly be part of the feasibility study is to see how that adapter is useful and what kind of accommodations may have to be made, since even that design now is a little bit out of date of what the agency is using for docking mechanisms.

“But it certainly does provide an opportunity for a direct docking without the need for a grapple arm,” Crouse said.

If Hubble’s orbit is not boosted, NASA will need to start thinking about a robotic disposal mission in the late 2020s that could be ready for launch by about 2030, Crouse said. That mission could attach a propulsion system to Hubble, which does not have its own thrusters for orbit control.

SpaceX’s Dragon Endeavour spacecraft departs the International Space Station on Nov. 8, 2021. Credit: NASA

Upgraded from earlier cargo freighter ships, SpaceX’s Crew Dragon spacecraft was designed for NASA’s commercial crew program, set up to develop new U.S. vehicles to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station after the retirement of the space shuttles. From the time of the shuttle’s retirement in 2011 until the first SpaceX crew launch in 2020, Russia’s Soyuz spacecraft was the sole provider of crew transport services to the space station.

SpaceX now has a fleet of four reusable crew-rated Dragon capsules designed to launch on top of Falcon 9 rockets and splash down under parachutes off the Florida coast.

The Dragon fleet has launched seven times so far with astronaut crews on-board, including a demonstration mission, four operational flights for NASA, and two commercial missions, including Isaacman’s Inspiration4 expedition and a private astronaut flight to the space station for Axiom Space.

NASA helped pay for the Crew Dragon spacecraft development, with more than $3.1 billion in government funding going toward design, testing, and the initial SpaceX crew flights to the space station. The space agency last month awarded SpaceX another $1.4 billion contract to five additional crew rotation missions to the space station, giving SpaceX a total of 14 operational Crew Dragon flights, four of which have already launched.

Boeing is NASA’s other commercial crew contractor. Boeing’s Starliner capsule has faced a series of technical issues, delaying its first launch with astronauts until no earlier than next February. The Starliner spacecraft successfully completed an unpiloted test flight to the space station in May.

Isaacman, 39, said the feasibility study announced Thursday will also look how commercial spacecraft like SpaceX’s Dragon could service other spacecraft in low Earth orbit. Satellite servicing has been a growing business in recent years, with Northrop Grumman completing two automated dockings in geostationary orbit with a robotic servicer to extend the lives of two commercial communications satellites. Other companies have also performed experiments and tested commercial servicing concepts.

“Over the last few years, what we’ve witnessed is just an impressive pace of progress across the aerospace industry,” Isaacman said. “Pioneering technology, like rapidly reusable rockets, has really begun to reduce the cost to orbit to such an extent that commercial space missions are now really possible.

“We take advantage of everything that’s been developed within the commercial space industry to potentially execute on a mission, should the study warrant it, with little or no potential cost to the government, which I think would be of great benefit to just all of humanity if you can extend the life and capabilities of an asset like Hubble, or potentially other assets,” Isaacman said.

“I think we cross the bridge on who’s ultimately going to fly it if the study ultimately supports embarking on a mission,” he said.

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/ne2yvJX
via World Space Info

Thursday 29 September 2022

Live coverage: Firefly set for middle-of-the-night launch from California

Live coverage of the countdown and launch of Firefly’s Alpha rocket on the “To the Black” test flight with seven small nanosatellites and picosatellites. Text updates will appear automatically below; there is no need to reload the page. Follow us on Twitter.

Video credit: Everyday Astronaut / Firefly Aerospace



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/Zom5rni
via World Space Info

Firefly ready for another try to launch test flight of smallsat rocket

Firefly’s Alpha rocket stands on its launch pad Sept. 29 at Vandenberg Space Force Base, California. Credit: Brian Sandoval / Spaceflight Now

After a delay of several weeks due to technical issues, bad weather, and a busy launch range, Firefly Aerospace is set to try again early Friday to send its commercial small satellite launcher into orbit on a test flight from Vandenberg Space Force Base, California.

The first two launch attempts for Firefly’s Alpha rocket were scrubbed Sept. 11 and 12, first to allow engineers to evaluate a drop in pressure in the rocket’s helium pressurization system, then by unfavorable weather at the California spaceport. Firefly then bypassed a launch opportunity Sept. 19 due to the forecast of bad weather, and United Launch Alliance had several days booked with the Western Range at Vandenberg for the liftoff of a Delta 4-Heavy rocket Sept. 24 with a classified U.S. government spy satellite.

The weather and scheduling constraints bumped Firefly’s next launch opportunity to Friday, when the company has a nearly two-hour launch window opening at 12:01 a.m. PDT and closing at 2 a.m. PDT (3:01-5:00 a.m. EDT; 0701-0900 GMT).

Firefly’s 96.7-foot-tall (29.5-meter) Alpha launch vehicle is standing on Space Launch Complex 2-West at Vandenberg, located roughly 140 miles (225 kilometers) northwest of Los Angeles on California’s picturesque Central Coast. The launch Friday will be the second flight of Firefly’s expendable Alpha rocket, following a failure on a test flight last September caused by the premature shutdown of one of the booster’s four main engines.

Based in Cedar Park, Texas, Firefly has given the second Alpha launch the nickname “To The Black.” The goal this time is to reach space.

Engineers determined that an electrical issue prompted one of the four kerosene-fueled Reaver engines on the first stage to shut down about 15 seconds after liftoff last year. Propellant flow valves closed to terminate thrust from the engine, but the rocket’s other three engines continued powering the rocket into the sky.

The rocket climbed slower than anticipated, its guidance computer commanding the remaining Reaver powerplants to swivel their nozzles to keep the launcher on course without the help of the dead engine. The Alpha launcher finally lost control as it reached supersonic speed. The range safety team at Vandenberg sent a command to terminate the flight about two-and-a-half minutes after liftoff, and the rocket exploded.

Firefly is now back on the SLC-2W launch pad at Vandenberg, the former West Coast home of United Launch Alliance’s Delta 2 rocket. There are seven small satellites mounted to the top of the Alpha launcher, which completed a test-firing of its four engines on the pad last month.

The two-stage Alpha rocket is designed to loft up to 2,580 pounds (1,170 kilograms) into a low-altitude orbit, or up to 1,642 pounds (745 kilograms) of payload to a 310-mile-high (500-kilometer) sun-synchronous polar orbit. The Alpha is one of many privately-developed small satellite launchers new to the market.

Firefly moved in at the SLC-2W launch site after the final United Launch Alliance Delta 2 rocket took off from the pad in 2018.

In addition to upgrading the Delta integration building and support facilities at the site, Firefly installed a brand new launch mount and transporter-erector at the pad. The Delta 2 was stacked vertically on the launch pad, while the Alpha launcher is assembled horizontally, then rolled out and lifted upright for launch.

Four Reaver engines on the first stage will generate more than 165,000 pounds of thrust at maximum power, and a Lightning engine on the second stage will produce more than 15,000 pounds of thrust. The rocket first and second stages measure about 6 feet, or 1.8 meters, in diameter, and the payload fairing is slightly wider at 6.6 feet (2 meters).

Firefly says expects to sell a dedicated Alpha launch for $15 million per flight, and believes the size of its rocket — which can carry heavier payloads than Rocket Lab’s Electron or Virgin Orbit’s LauncherOne — differentiates it from other prospective launch providers in the smallsat launch market.

Firefly Aerospace was previously named Firefly Space Systems before entering bankruptcy. The renamed company emerged from bankruptcy proceedings in 2017 under new ownership led by Noosphere Ventures, a Menlo Park, California-based firm led by Ukrainian-born managing partner Max Polyakov.

The company underwent another ownership shakeup earlier this year when AE Industrial Partners purchased Noosphere’s stake. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States requested Polyakov sell his share of Firefly ownership, and the U.S. government limited Firefly’s operations at Vandenberg until the sale was completed, the company said in a statement last year.

With Polyakov’s Noosphere Ventures out of the picture, Firefly resumed launch operations at Vandenberg ahead of the second Alpha test flight.

While Firefly’s near-term focus is on the Alpha rocket program, the company last month announced an agreement with Northrop Grumman to develop and build engines for an upgraded version of the Antares rocket used to launch resupply missions to the International Space Station. Northrop Grumman’s Antares rocket is currently powered by Russian-made engines, and the company only has engines for two more Antares flights before needing to transition to a U.S.-made propulsion system.

Firefly is also a partner with NASA to develop a robotic lunar lander to transport science experiments to the moon.

The company is planning a second launch site that would be located at the disused Complex 20 launch pad at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida.

For its second demonstration mission, Firefly’s Alpha rocket will attempt to launch on a similar mission profile to the one it was supposed to fly on the failed test flight last year. It will target a 186-mile-high inclined 137 degrees to the equator. The unusual orbit, called a retrograde orbit because the rocket will travel against the Earth’s rotation, will require the Alpha launcher to head southwest over the Pacific Ocean on a track passing just south of Hawaii.

The Alpha’s Reaver first stage engines will shut down nearly three minutes after liftoff, before the booster jettisons to fall into the Pacific Ocean. The second stage’s Lightning engine for a six-minute burn to reach a parking orbit, followed by a coast halfway around the world before reigniting the engine about 54 minutes after liftoff.

If all goes according to plan, the rocket will deploy seven CubeSats and tiny “picosatellite” payloads about an hour into the mission.

The satellites on the Alpha rocket set for launch Friday include an CubeSat called Serenity 2 developed by Teachers in Space, a non-profit organization with a mission to excite students about science, technology, engineering and mathematics by providing their teachers with space science experiences and industry connections. While the primary purpose of the 3.7-pound (1.7-kilogram) Serenity 2 CubeSat is to support education, the nanosatellite also carries instruments to collect data on atmospheric pressure, temperature and radiation.

The TechEdSat 15 CubeSat developed at NASA’s Ames Research Center is also aboard the Alpha rocket to test a drag brake mechanism that could help target the re-entry of small satellites. The deployable “eco-brake” is designed to generate drag and accelerate the deorbit of a small spacecraft. The system flying on the 9.1-pound (4.1-kilogram) TechEdSat 15 spacecraft is intended to survive higher temperatures, up to several hundred degrees, and “will demonstrate the next step forward in nanosatellites’ ability to target an Earth entry point,” Firefly said.

“The exo-brake is a device that applies drag in Earth’s exosphere — the uppermost reaches of the atmosphere — to slow the speed of a satellite’s descent and change its direction,” Firefly said. “This experiment will permit the satellite to survive closer-to-peak heating, maintain telemetry, and assess the dynamics as the system enters the top of the atmosphere.”

Five smaller “picosats” are also mounted in a deployer on Firefly’s Alpha rocket. Here’s a description of those payloads from Firefly’s press kit.

• The GENESIS-L and GENESIS-N payloads from from AMSAT Spain will launch on a technology demonstration mission for amateur radio operators, and test a micro sub-joule pulsed plasma thruster.

• The FOSSASAT-1B picosat from Fossa Systems in Spain will test long range communications, an attitude determination and control system, and a low-resolution Earth imager

• The Qubik 3 and Qubik 4 payloads from Libre Space Foundation, based in Greece, will perform multiple telecommunications experiments.

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/6QqwcdX
via World Space Info

Russian Soyuz brings three cosmonauts home from space station

STORY WRITTEN FOR CBS NEWS & USED WITH PERMISSION

Russia’s Soyuz MS-21 lands in Kazakhstan with three cosmonauts on-board. Credit: GCTC

Three cosmonauts undocked from the International Space Station Thursday and returned to Earth aboard their Soyuz spacecraft, safely landing on the steppe of Kazakhstan to wrap up a 195-day mission.

With outgoing station commander Oleg Artemyev at the controls, flanked on the left by co-pilot Denis Matveev and on the right by Sergey Korsakov, the Soyuz descent module, suspended under a single large orange-and-white parachute, touched down near the town of Dzhezkazgan at 6:57 a.m. EDT (4:57 p.m. local time).

Russian recovery crews were on the scene within minutes to help the returning station fliers out of the cramped Soyuz as they began re-adapting to the unfamiliar pull of gravity after six months in weightlessness

Mission duration was 194 days and 19 hours, pushing Artemyev’s total time in space to 561 days over three station expeditions and moving him up to No. 12 on the list of most experienced cosmonauts and astronauts. It was the first space flight for Matveev and Korsakov.

Matveev looked a bit woozy being helped from the descent module, but Artemyev and Korsakov were all smiles as they chatted with support personnel. After quick medical checks, the cosmonauts were expected to head back to Star City near Moscow for debriefings and reunions with friends and family.

Left behind in orbit were Expedition 68 commander Samantha Cristoforetti and her three SpaceX Crew-4 crewmates Kjell Lindgren, Robert Hines and Jessica Watkins, along with Soyuz MS-22/68S cosmonauts Sergey Prokopyev, Dmitry Petelin and NASA astronaut Frank Rubio.

Prokopyev, Petelin and Rubio replaced Artemyev and his crewmates, arriving at the station on September 21. Replacements for the Crew 4 astronauts — Crew 5 commander Nicole Mann, Josh Cassada, Japanese astronaut Koichi Wakata and cosmonaut Anna Kikina — are expected to launch from the Kennedy Space Center on October 5, Florida weather permitting.

After about a week helping familiarize their replacements with station operations, Cristoforetti, Lindgren, Hines and Watkins will undock and return to Earth October 12 or 13 to close out a roughly 169-day mission that began with launch from the Kennedy Space Center on April 27.

The launch of Rubio aboard the Soyuz MS-22/68S spacecraft and Kikina aboard the Crew 5 Dragon marked the first such flights under a new agreement between NASA and Roscosmos that’s intended to ensure at least one Russian and one American are always on board the station.

Without the agreement, a medical emergency or some other problem that forced a Soyuz or SpaceX crew to depart early could leave an all-U.S. or all-Russian crew behind on station without the expertise to operate the other nation’s systems. The seat-swap agreement resolves that potential worry.



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/jktU2AI
via World Space Info

Live coverage: Russian cosmonauts depart station, head for landing

Live coverage of the Soyuz MS-21 mission on the International Space Station. Text updates will appear automatically below; there is no need to reload the page. Follow us on Twitter.



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/cgykrt7
via World Space Info

NASA spacecraft smashes into asteroid in first planetary defense test

The long-range navigation camera on NASA’s DART spacecraft captured this view of asteroid Dimorphos moments before impact. Credit: NASA/JHUAPL

A $330 million NASA mission completed what amounts to an interplanetary game of darts Monday night with an on-target collision with a space rock nearly 7 million miles from Earth, testing a technique that scientists could use in the future to protect our home planet from a threatening asteroid.

Scientists were elated with the result Monday night, heralding as a turning point in humanity’s ability to protect Earth from threats from the sky. But it will take up to two months to precisely measure how much the impact of NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test, or DART, spacecraft knocked its target asteroid off of its orbit.

“Congratulations! Boy, the DART team, you really did this one very well. … I believe it’s going to teach us how to one day protect our own planet from an incoming asteroid,” said NASA Administrator Bill Nelson. “So thank you to this international team. We are showing that planetary defense is a global endeavor, and it is very possible to save our planet.”

The DART spacecraft was the size of a vending machine — with a mass less than 1,300 pounds, or 600 kilograms — before it slammed into asteroid Dimorphos at a velocity of some 14,700 mph (6.6 kilometers per second). The collision destroyed the spacecraft and was expected to leave a crater on the surface of Dimorphos, an asteroid the size of a sports stadium that orbits a larger half-mile-side companion named Didymos.

The two asteroids, called a binary pair, are located about 0.6 miles (1 kilometer) from each other. Scientists will use telescopes on Earth to track the motion of Dimorphos around Didymos, and measure how much the kinetic energy imparted by the DART impact changed the orbit.

“Now is when the science starts,” says Lori Glaze, director of NASA’s planetary science division. “Now that we’ve impacted, now we’re going to see, for real, how effective we were. We’re going to train all those ground-based telescopes on the Didymos-Dimorphos system, and we’re going to make measurements that will help us determine just what its orbit looks like now relative to what it was before.”

“We’re embarking on a new era of humankind, an era in which we potentially have the capability to protect ourselves from something like a dangerous, hazardous asteroid impact,” Glaze said. “What an amazing thing. We’ve never had that capability before.”

DART hit Dimorphos at 7:14 p.m. EDT (2314 GMT) Monday to complete a 10-month flight since the spacecraft launched last November on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from California.

“I definitely think that, as far as we can tell, our first planetary defense test was a success,” said Elena Adams, DART’s mission systems engineer at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Maryland, which built and operated the spacecraft for NASA. “So, yeah, I think Earthlings should sleep better. Definitely I will!”

Mark Jensenius, a guidance engineer for DART’s SMART Nav navigation system, said the spacecraft guided itself to within 17 meters, or 56 feet, of the center of the sunlit portion of the asteroid. “This mission was straight down the middle of what our expectations were, and there we no adjustments needed,” he said.

Dimorphos and Didymos pose no near-term threat to Earth, according to NASA. Scientists using ground-based telescopes will measure how the DART spacecraft’s collision changed the course of Dimorphos around Didymos, validating models of how a kinetic impactor in the future could nudge an asteroid off a path that would strike Earth.

Scientists expected about 2 million pounds of rock and dust from Dimorphos would be thrown into space, equivalent to about 0.02% of the asteroid’s estimated total mass.

Didymos and Dimorphos are officially classified as near-Earth asteroids, although scientists say there is no near-term threat from the pair. No space mission before DART had ever explored the asteroids, but scientists who have observed them through telescopes say the asteroids are about a half-mile (780 meters) and 525 feet (160 meters) in diameter, respectively.

Experts estimate there should be around 25,000 near-Earth asteroids the size of Dimorphos. An asteroid of that size that impacts Earth could wipe out a metropolitan area, causing mass casualties.

NASA says surveys have discovered around 40% of similar-sized near-Earth asteroids. Scientists have found more than 95% of the population of larger 1-kilometer-class (0.6-mile) near-Earth asteroids, which could wreak global damage if they hit our planet. The percentage is much lower for the smaller asteroids, but they pose a more limited risk.

The DART mission is the first project by NASA’s Planetary Defense Coordination Office, set up in 2016 to help detect, track, and potentially defend Earth against potentially hazardous asteroids.

NASA plans to launch its second planetary defense mission, an infrared telescope and follow-on to DART, in the late 2020s to find most of the undetected dangerous near-Earth asteroids.

“We’re not aware of a single object right now within the next 100 years or so that is really threatening the Earth,” said Thomas Zurbuchen, head of NASA’s science mission directorate. “But I’ll also guarantee to you that if you wait long enough, there will be an object.”

“Our work right now with the DART mission is one possibility of what we might do if we found an asteroid on an impact course with the Earth,” said Lindley Johnson, NASA’s planetary defense officer, before the mission launched last year. “So we’re testing this kinetic impactor technique, where we just ram a spacecraft into the asteroid at high velocity to shave a little bit of speed off of its path, and that changes into the future.”

A small speed adjustment could result in large changes in the asteroid’s location years or decades into the future, meaning that with enough warning, a relatively compact spacecraft could be all that is needed to safeguard Earth from an impact.

“Our objective is to find these objects far way in time and far away from Earth, and to be able to enact this change in their orbit many years in advance, so it doesn’t take much to change them at all,” Johnson said.

“This demonstration will start to add tools to our toolbox of methods that could be used in the future, and we need several of them because the circumstances that we might face could be quite different,” Johnson said. ”

The most effective deflection method would depend on the size of a potentially threatening asteroid, along with its orbit and when it might hit Earth,

“Some of the other things that have been studied are what we call a gravity tractor, which is just taking a spacecraft and station keeping with the asteroid and using nature’s tug rope, gravity, the mutual attraction between the spacecraft and the asteroid will slowly tug that asteroid out of its impacting trajectory into a more benign one,” Johnson said. “Of course a technique like that takes longer to implement, so we would have to have more warning time to be able to implement it.”

Other options include ion beam deflection, where an ion engine could fire particles into an asteroid to gradually push it off course. And there’s the more violet nuclear option, which could involve a detonation near the asteroid.

The kinetic impact technique was put to the test Monday. In order for it work, the DART mission fused military-grade missile defense guidance technology to help the spacecraft home in on its asteroid target. And then scientists were ready with ground-based telescopes and space-based observatories — including the James Webb Space Telescope — to watch the sky for signs that DART hit the faint asteroid, then measure how the collision altered the trajectory of Dimorphos.

Scientists predicted the impact would change the speed of Dimorphos around its companion Didymos by about 1%, likely reducing the time it takes to complete one orbit from 11 hours and 55 minutes to around 11 hours and 45 minutes. But the remaining goal of the DART experiment will be to try to confirm those estimates, and it could take several weeks to two months for scientists to precisely measure the orbit change.

The DART spacecraft downlinked near-real time images from its navigation camera at a rate of one frame per second until the impact Monday night.

Artist’s concept of the DART spacecraft, with its LICIACube ride along spacecraft, approaching asteroids Didymos and Dimorphos. Credit: NASA

The spacecraft’s Didymos Reconnaissance and Asteroid Camera for Optical navigation, or DRACO, imaging system, took pictures of the Didymos and Dimorphos asteroids just before impact, collecting information on the asteroids’ locations to help DART navigate toward an aim point at the center of Dimorphos.

The final phase of the approach Monday played out quickly. DART’s on-board computer took control around four hours before impact, using sophisticated on-board navigation algorithms derived from missile guidance systems, called Small-body Maneuvering Autonomous Real Time Navigation, or SMART Nav.

The corrections needed to guide DART in toward Dimorphos were too fast for mission control to command, and there was a 38-second communication delay from the asteroid’s location to Earth, a distance of around 6.8 million miles (11 million kilometers).

Twelve hydrazine-fueled thrusters steered DART on its final collision course.

DART streamed live video back to Earth from its DRACO camera. Because of the high-speed approach and the small size of Dimorphos, the target asteroid was only revealed in DRACO’s view finder in the final 90 minutes before impact. Didymos, somewhat larger than Dimorphos, was already resolved by DART’s DRACO camera.

About 50 minutes before impact, with SMART Nav at the wheel, DART’s navigation system started to adjust its target from Didymos to Dimorphos. With around 20 minutes to go, DART transitioned to “precision lock” mode, where the navigation system ignored Didymos to aim for Dimorphos. Didymos exited the field of view in the DRACO camera in the final few minutes before impact.

The spacecraft shut off all its thrusters around two-and-a-half minutes before impact, allowing DART to coast for the rest of the journey.

DART’s data handling system was designed to capture pictures, process them, and then downlink them to Earth in about 2 seconds, ensuring that the final image received on Earth would be taken just before impact. With the processing time on the spacecraft and the ground, coupled with the 38-second light travel time from DART back to Earth, the imagery received on the ground was displayed with a lag of about 45 seconds behind real time.

Going into Monday’s approach, scientists knew little about the shape of Dimorphos, which was discovered with a ground-based telescope in 2003. Didymos, the larger asteroid of the pair, was discovered in 1996, and scientists had some basic knowledge of its shape, thanks to radar observations.

The asteroids started as points of light in DART’s camera view, but quickly filled the frame, with imagery revealing boulders and surface features in the moments before striking Dimorphos.

The DART spacecraft released a small ride along spacecraft called LICIACube on Sept. 11. The stowaway spacecraft was provided by the Italian Space Agency, and is about the size of a small briefcase. It flew a few minutes behind DART and was expected to images of the impact before sailing past Dimorphos at a range of around 34 miles (55 kilometers).

LICIACube’s images didn’t come down live. They will be downlinked back to Earth slowly over the days following DART’s impact.

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/ZdyvqCL
via World Space Info

Wednesday 28 September 2022

SpaceX, ULA postpone launches as Hurricane Ian moves toward Florida

A view from NOAA’s GOES-16 weather satellite of Hurricane Ian making landfall in Southwest Florida on Sept. 28. Credit: NOAA

The forecast track of Hurricane Ian across Central Florida has forced SpaceX and United Launch Alliance to postpone several upcoming launches at Cape Canaveral, including the next crew flight to the International Space Station, a Starlink mission, and the liftoff of an Atlas 5 rocket.

SpaceX planned to launch two Falcon 9 rockets Sept. 30 and Oct. 3, one with the next batch of Starlink internet satellites and another with a team of four astronauts and cosmonauts to begin a five-month expedition on the International Space Station.

Both missions have been postponed, with the crew launch now tentatively rescheduled for no earlier than Oct. 5 at 12 p.m. EDT (1600 GMT). NASA previously announced Tuesday that the mission launch of the Crew-5 mission would be delayed at least a day to Oct. 4, and the missions could be pushed back again. After Oct. 5, SpaceX has additional launch opportunities available for Crew-5 on Oct. 7, 8, and 9.

NASA astronauts Nicole Mann and Josh Cassada, both first-time space fliers, will serve as commander and pilot on the Crew-5 mission, the fifth operational flight of a SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft to the space station under contract with NASA. Veteran Japanese astronaut Koichi Wakata and rookie Russian cosmonaut Anna Kikina will also launch on the Crew-5 mission.

Mann’s crew will replace another team of four astronauts who have been on the space station since April on the Crew-4 mission. That crew, commanded by NASA astronaut Kjell Lindgren, will depart the station and return to Earth for splashdown off the coast of Florida about five days after Crew-5 arrives, whenever that occurs.

SpaceX ground teams moved the Crew Dragon Endurance spacecraft from the ship’s fueling facility to the Falcon 9 rocket hangar Sept. 23 near Launch Complex 39A at Kennedy Space Center. Technicians mated the capsule to the Falcon 9 rocket inside the hangar, where the launcher remains secured to ride out Hurricane Ian.

“The Dragon Endurance spacecraft is currently mated to the Falcon 9 rocket and safely secured inside SpaceX’s hangar at Launch Complex 39A,” NASA said in a statement. “Kennedy Space Center is also making preparations across the spaceport to secure other property and infrastructure. After the storm progresses, teams from NASA and SpaceX will evaluate the potential impacts to the center and determine whether to adjust the mission timeline further.”

SpaceX’s Crew Dragon Endurance spacecraft moves toward the Falcon 9 hangar at Launch Complex 39A on Sept. 23. Credit: SpaceX

SpaceX will wait to roll the Falcon 9 rocket Dragon spacecraft the quarter-mile distance from the hangar up the ramp to pad 39A after the bad weather passes from Hurricane Ian, which made landfall on Southwest Florida Wednesday shortly after 3 p.m. EDT (1900 GMT) as a strong Category 4 hurricane. Forecasters predict Hurricane Ian will slowly move north-northeast across Florida, potentially bringing tropical storm conditions to the Cape Canaveral spaceport.

“We’re ready to roll out whenever the weather is ready to go roll out,” said Bill Gerstenmaier, vice president of build and flight reliability at SpaceX. “But we don’t want to roll out and end up with high winds and rain. We’ve got the right criteria. We shared that with NASA Kennedy Space Center so they know what our constraints are.”

Mann and her crewmates remain in Houston. They were scheduled to fly to Kennedy Space Center on Monday, but NASA managers decided to hold off on that milestone as Hurricane Ian threatened to move toward Florida. They will need to travel to KSC at least four days before liftoff to participate in final training activities, including a dress rehearsal at the launch pad, where the crew members will board the Dragon capsule to practice for launch day.

SpaceX also planned to launch a Falcon 9 rocket Friday from pad 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, a few miles south of pad 39A, with another batch of Starlink internet satellites. That launch has also been postponed into October, likely after a pair of Falcon 9 missions planned from pad 40 for commercial customers Intelsat and Eutelsat set for Oct. 5 and Oct. 13.

That shuffling in SpaceX’s launch schedule would push back the next Starlink mission from Cape Canaveral until mid-October. SpaceX officials have said they prioritize missions with customer payloads.

Gerstenmaier said SpaceX’s fast-paced launch schedule, primarily driven by Starlink missions, helps improve reliability for astronaut launches. SpaceX has launched 43 Falcon 9 rocket flights so far this year, already a record number of space launches by a commercial company in a calendar year.

“W’ve been flying a lot of missions, a lot of Starlink missions,” Gerstenmaier said. “I think that really helps the crew program. We learn a lot in those missions and we can carry that learning directly into crewed missions. But I will tell you crewed missions are special. They are very different to us. they are not routine in any way, shape, or form. we treat these missions with more respect than any missions we fly.”

United Launch Alliance’s Atlas 5 rocket inside the Vertical Integration Facility with the SES 20 and SES 21 communications satellites on-board. Credit: United Launch Alliance

Meanwhile, United Launch Alliance has postponed the launch of an Atlas 5 rocket from pad 41 until no earlier than Oct. 4 at 5:36 p.m. EDT (2136 GMT), a four-day delay from the previous target date. The Atlas 5 rocket and its payloads are fully stacked inside ULA’s Vertical Integration Facility, ready for rollout to pad 41 once the weather clears. ULA teams hoisted the rocket’s payload fairing, containing two commercial TV broadcasting spacecraft for the satellite operator SES, on top of the Atlas 5 rocket earlier this month.

“Both satellites are integrated to the launch vehicle and safely secured within the Vehicle Integration Facility at SLC-41,” ULA said in a statement.

The Atlas 5 rocket needs to roll out to the launch pad the day before liftoff to prepare for the countdown.

Hurricane Ian is also impacting other operations at the Cape Canaveral spaceport. All regular work at Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station has been suspended.

NASA rolled the Artemis 1 moon rocket back to the Vehicle Assembly Building early Tuesday to take shelter from the hurricane, likely delaying the inaugural flight of the Space Launch System until mid-November. The agency previously hoped to launch the uncrewed Artemis 1 test flight to the moon this week, following scrubbed launch attempts Aug. 29 and Sept. 3.

Read our full story on the Artemis 1 rollback to the VAB.

Relativity Space, a commercial startup planning its first orbital launch attempt later this year, moved its Terran 1 booster off its launch pad at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station after a series of engine hotfire tests. Most recently, Relativity test-fired the rocket’s nine methane-fueled engines at Launch Complex 16 for 82 seconds on Sept. 23.

“Rolling back to hangar to keep vehicle safe during impending hurricane in Florida,” said Tim Ellis, Relativity’s co-founder and CEO. “Early data and hardware looking solid from last week’s extensive stage one testing, super happy with the results.”

Relativity Space’s Terran 1 rocket moves into the company’s hangar at Launch Complex 16 to take shelter from Hurricane Ian. Credit: Relativity Space

Other activities at the Cape Canaveral spaceport have also been affected by the threat from Hurricane Ian. A large crane supporting construction of SpaceX’s new Starship launch pad at Launch Complex 39A was lowered and secured Tuesday.

Several spacecraft are also at the spaceport preparing for future launches, aside from SpaceX’s Dragon Endurance crew capsule and the two SES communications satellites already attached to their rockets.

Intelsat’s Galaxy 33 and 34 television broadcasting satellites and Eutelsat’s Hotbird 13F communications spacecraft are undergoing final launch preparations at a payload processing facility at Cape Canaveral. NASA’s Psyche asteroid explorer is secured at Kennedy Space Center’s Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility awaiting a launch opportunity as soon as next July, following a launch delay earlier this year to resolve software concerns with the robotic science mission.

The U.S. Space Force is also believed to have a classified payload at Cape Canaveral preparing for launch on a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket later this year.

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/64KITMW
via World Space Info

Watch live views from Kennedy Space Center as Hurricane Ian impacts Florida

Watch live views from our cameras at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida as Hurricane Ian brings heavy rain and gusty winds to the Space Coast. NASA moved the Artemis 1 moon rocket back inside the Vehicle Assembly Building on Tuesday.

SFN Live



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/70ALazS
via World Space Info

Artemis 1 rocket moved to hangar as spaceport completes hurricane preps

NASA’s Space Launch System moon rocket moves into the Vehicle Assembly Building on Sept. 27. Credit: Stephen Clark / Spaceflight Now

NASA moved the Space Launch System moon rocket back into its hangar Tuesday to take shelter from Hurricane Ian, likely pushing back the next launch attempt for the agency’s long-delayed Artemis 1 lunar test flight until mid-November as Kennedy Space Center braces for high winds and flooding rains.

The 322-foot-tall (98-meter) moon rocket arrived in the Vehicle Assembly Building Tuesday morning, and NASA confirmed the rocket’s mobile launch platform was “hard down” on pedestals inside High Bay 3 at 10:05 a.m. EDT (1405 GMT). The arrival in the VAB wrapped up a nearly 11-hour rollback from Launch Complex 39B that began at 11:20 p.m. EDT (0320 GMT).

NASA officials decided Monday to proceed with the rollback to protect the $4.1 billion Space Launch System moon rocket, which is set to take off with an unpiloted Orion crew capsule on a flight around the moon. The Artemis 1 test flight is designed to verify the performance of the powerful rocket and crew capsule before astronauts strap in for future flights to the moon.

“We waited, I’d say, about as long as we could, but still had a window to the keep the vehicle safe and get back to the VAB,” said Jim Free, associate administrator for NASA’s exploration systems mission development, which oversees the SLS moon rocket and Orion programs.

The Space Launch System is not protected by a gantry when it’s on the launch pad, but NASA engineers have certified the rocket to withstand wind gusts up to 74 knots (85 mph). Managers waited through the weekend to monitor the changing forecast for Hurricane Ian, then decided Monday morning to move the rocket back to the hangar.

A small fire was reported on an electrical panel on the wall of High Bay 3 inside the Vehicle Assembly Building soon after the SLS moon rocket arrived back at the hangar. Janet Petro, director of Kennedy Space Center, said the VAB was evacuated and the fire was put out with no injuries to any personnel. She said the Artemis 1 moon rocket was not at risk from the fire, and workers returned to the VAB to resume their work.

Elsewhere at Kennedy Space Center and neighboring Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, teams are securing facilities and preparing power generators before Hurricane Ian’s impacts reach the spaceport. Regular work will be suspended at the space center, and a rideout team will remain on base during the storm to monitor infrastructure and assess damage.

“Safety of the workforce and property is the No. 1 priority, and this is reflected in all of our planning,” Petro said. “We have a hurricane plan that applies to all NASA and contractor organizations, as well as our launch partners and our NASA facilities located on the space force station.”

One of the most visible signs of preparing for the hurricane was the rollback of the SLS moon rocket. A diesel-powered crawler transporter carried the SLS moon rocket off the pad for the 4.2-mile (6.8-kilometer) journey back to the VAB on Tuesday. Reaching a top speed of 0.8 mph (1.3 kilometers per hour), the combined stack of the crawler, mobile launch platform, and moon rocket weighed more than 21 million pounds as it trekked back to the assembly building.

It was the sixth time the SLS moon rocket has moved between the VAB and the launch pad since March, and engineers prefer to minimize the moves to limit wear and tear on the rocket from the vibrations of riding on top of the crawler. But in the end, NASA decided it was more risky to leave the rocket on the pad with tropical storm or hurricane force winds possible at Kennedy Space Center this week.

NASA hoped to try to launch the Artemis 1 test flight this week, with a launch attempt penciled in for Tuesday. But that changed late last week as officials began preparations for rollback to the assembly building. The current Artemis 1 launch period closes Oct. 4, and another two-week launch period opens Oct. 17 and runs through Oct. 31.

Free said Tuesday it will be “difficult” to have the Artemis 1 moon rocket ready to fly by the end of the next launch period at the end of October. The next series of launch dates begin Nov. 12 and extend through Nov. 27.

The launch periods are primarily driven by the position of the moon in its orbit around Earth, along with concerns about shadowing of the Orion spacecraft’s solar panels, and a requirement for the mission trajectory to result in a daytime splashdown of the Orion spacecraft in the Pacific Ocean.

Engineers plan several tasks with the rocket back in the VAB, including swapping out batteries on the flight termination system, which range safety teams would use to destroy the launch vehicle if it flies off course after liftoff and threatens populated areas. The battery changeout work will require technicians to open an access door and enter the “intertank” section of the SLS core stage, the volume between the core stage’s liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen tanks.

“Changing out the batteries, I won’t say it’s simple, but the team knows how to do it,” Free said.

The U.S. Space Force’s Eastern Range, which is responsible for public safety for all launches from Florida’s Space Coast, granted NASA a waiver last week to extend their certification of the flight termination system batteries long enough to enable Artemis 1 launch attempts through early October. The batteries were originally only certified for 25 days, long enough to allow Artemis 1 launch attempts through early September.

Changing out and re-testing the batteries is only possible with the rocket back inside the VAB.

NASA engineers will also spend the next few weeks assessing parts of the Space Launch System moon rocket and Orion spacecraft that could have lifetime limitations. NASA began stacking the rocket’s solid-fueled boosters on the mobile launch platform in November 2020, and capped off stacking of the rocket with the addition of the Orion spacecraft last October.

Engineers are analyzing the condition of pre-packed propellants inside the Space Launch System’s solid rocket boosters, which originally were only certified for 12 months once stacked on the launch platform. That lifetime limit has been extended by engineering reviews, and John Blevins, the SLS program’s chief engineer, recently said the boosters should be good for at least a few more months.

There is also a limit for how long hypergolic hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide propellants can be loaded on the service module of the Orion spacecraft. The hypergolic propellants will be used for in-space maneuvers by the Orion propulsion system during the trip to the moon and back.

“We have a list of, I’d say, about 20 things that we’re looking at that have different durations in which we have to revisit them,” Free said. “We’re always looking at batteries in general. Obviously, we’re looking at some of the hypergol (propellant) storage on the service module. We want to make sure that we’re staying on top of and understanding the long term implications of that.”

Engineers are evaluating the conditions different components have been exposed to since stacking began on the Artemis 1 moon rocket, Free said.

“The limited life items are set by how often the engineering team decided they need to be revisited,” Free said. “So it could be every 30 days, 60 days, 365 days, so it’s kind of a running clock of things. Some of them are analytical, some of them are actual hardware measurements.”

The engineering reviews of “limited life” items, the flight termination system battery changeout, and any impacts from Hurricane Ian will drive the Artemis 1 schedule as NASA looks to set a new target launch date. Ground teams at Kennedy will also likely recharge batteries on some of the CubeSat ridehsare payloads on the SLS moon rocket, which will perform their own scientific missions in deep space, including observations of the moon, space weather, and an asteroid.

“If we’re looking at early next week for the team to come back (after Hurricane Ian), we’re talking Oct. 3, and our launch period opens back up on the 17th,” Free said. “It’s just a challenge of can we get in there, get the volumes open, and say we can turn and get back out there for another launch attempt. We don’t want to go out too fast, and then we’re stuck in a situation where maybe we didn’t get to all of the limited life items we wanted to look at because we’re trying to get back out there.”

With winter approaching in the northern hemisphere, most of of the Artemis 1 launch windows in the next few months will be at night. The first days of the November launch period all come with middle of the night launch times.

“I think our preference is to launch in the daylight,” Free said. “I think we feel like the visuals that we get from our long range tracking cameras are of benefit to us. We do have obviously some ways we can view the vehicle if we were to launch in the dark. I think we look at the risk versus benefit trade. So our preference is probably a daylight launch but we don’t rule out the nighttime launch either.”

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/n6QDS4H
via World Space Info

Comment on SpaceX Continues Aggressive East Coast Starlink Launch Campaign by Artemis I Stack Back in VAB, as Launch Dates Shift in Response to Hurricane Ian - AmericaSpace

[…] of Starlink internet communications satellites, bound for low-Earth orbit, the mission is expected to be flown by SpaceX’s veteran B1062 booster, which is set to become the sixth Falcon 9 in a little more than a year to log a tenth […]



from Comments for AmericaSpace https://ift.tt/hPz21UZ
via World Space Info

Artemis I Stack Back in VAB, as Launch Dates Shift in Response to Hurricane Ian

As @NASA_SLS returns to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB), three upcoming missions look set to meet with delay as Hurricane Ian approaches the Space Coast.

The post Artemis I Stack Back in VAB, as Launch Dates Shift in Response to Hurricane Ian first appeared on AmericaSpace.



from AmericaSpace https://ift.tt/a73MIq6
via World Space Info

Tuesday 27 September 2022

Comment on Dragon Endeavour Splashes Down, Concludes Historic Ax-1 Mission by Crew-5 Ready for Launch, Six-Month Space Station Mission - AmericaSpace

[…] To date, she has logged 64 days in space in May-August 2020—during which she ferried Demo-2 astronauts Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken to and from the ISS—and last year’s 199-day Crew-2 increment. More recently, Endeavour supported the first all-private mission to the station, AxiomSpace, Inc.’s 17-day Ax-1, earlier this spring. […]



from Comments for AmericaSpace https://ift.tt/4hK9fwJ
via World Space Info

Comment on Rubio, Crewmates Prepare for Busy Expedition 68 by Crew-5 Ready for Launch, Six-Month Space Station Mission - AmericaSpace

[…] week, NASA astronaut Frank Rubio joined Russian cosmonauts Sergei Prokopyev and Dmitri Petelin in launching to the ISS aboard Soyuz […]



from Comments for AmericaSpace https://ift.tt/dTADWUN
via World Space Info

Comment on Crew-5 Targets 29 September Launch, Second Flight for Dragon Endurance by Crew-5 Ready for Launch, Six-Month Space Station Mission - AmericaSpace

[…] As previously outlined by AmericaSpace, the Crew-5 quartet has been training for this mission on several fronts for more than a year. Mann and Cassada, both selected as Astronaut Candidates (ASCANs) by NASA in June 2013, were assigned as Commander and Pilot of the mission last October. […]



from Comments for AmericaSpace https://ift.tt/7YKmSdP
via World Space Info

Crew-5 Ready for Launch, Six-Month Space Station Mission

Only a week now remains before @AstroDuke, @astro_josh, @Astro_Wakata & Russia's Anna Kikina launch on 3 Oct to @Space_Station.

The post Crew-5 Ready for Launch, Six-Month Space Station Mission first appeared on AmericaSpace.



from AmericaSpace https://ift.tt/MIW7RN0
via World Space Info

Monday 26 September 2022

Live coverage: NASA to move Artemis 1 moon rocket back to assembly building overnight

Live coverage of pre-launch preparations for NASA’s Artemis 1 mission. Text updates will appear automatically below; there is no need to reload the page. Follow us on Twitter.

SFN Live



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/LlSONzJ
via World Space Info

Live coverage: NASA’s DART spacecraft on course to slam into asteroid tonight

Live coverage of NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test, or DART mission. Text updates will appear automatically below; there is no need to reload the page. Follow us on Twitter.

NASA TV coverage

Live feed from NASA's DART spacecraft



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/jcyDMFN
via World Space Info

NASA spacecraft on track for asteroid deflection experiment

Artist’s concept of the DART spacecraft, with its LICIACube ride along spacecraft, approaching asteroids Didymos and Dimorphos. Credit: NASA

A NASA spacecraft is aiming to slam into a stadium-size asteroid at more than 14,000 mph Monday in a planetary defense experiment to test a technique that could be used in the future to divert threatening asteroids off a collision course with Earth.

The Double Asteroid Redirection Test, or DART, mission will try to change the orbit of the asteroid Dimorphos, the smaller object in a binary pair of asteroids circling the sun close to Earth’s orbit. Dimorphos and its larger companion, named Didymos, pose no near-term threat to Earth, according to NASA.

Scientists will measure how the DART spacecraft’s collision changes the course of Dimorphos around Didymos, validating models of how a kinetic impactor in the future could knock an asteroid off a path that would strike Earth.

“This inaugural planetary defense test mission marks a major moment in human history,” said Bobby Braun, head of space exploration at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Maryland, which built, manages, and controls the DART spacecraft for NASA. “For the first time ever, we will measurably change the orbit of a celestial body in the universe. Doing so has clear benefits in ensuring humanity’s ability to deflect a potential threatening asteroid in the future.”

The DART spacecraft launched last November on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. The spacecraft is about the size of a vending machine with a mass of less than 1,300 pounds, or 600 kilograms. It has two roll-out solar array wings spread out to a span of more than 60 feet (19 meters), which have generated electrical power through the spacecraft’s 10-month cruise to set up for Monday’s impact.

If all goes according to plan, DART will strike asteroid Dimorphos at 7:14 p.m. EDT (2314 GMT) Monday at a relative velocity of more than 14,000 mph, or about 4.1 miles per second (6.6 kilometers per second). The impact will pulverize the DART spacecraft, and scientists expect about 2 million pounds of rock and dust from Dimorphos will be thrown into space, equivalent to about 0.025% of the asteroid’s estimated total mass.

“We’re doing this test at a double asteroid, a binary asteroid, with the larger asteroid being orbited by its smaller moon Dimorphos,” said Tom Statler, DART’s program scientist at NASA Headquarters. “This is the perfect natural laboratory for this double test because there are two tests in DART. The first test is the test of our ability to build an autonomously guided spacecraft that will actually achieve the kinetic impact on the asteroid. The second test is the test of how the actual asteroid responds to the kinetic impact because, at the end of the day, the real question is how effectively did we move the asteroid? And can this technique of kinetic impact be used in the future if we ever needed to?”

Scientists classify Didymos and Dimorphos as near-Earth asteroids, although scientists say there is no near-term threat from the pair. No space mission has ever explored the asteroids, but scientists who have observed them through telescopes say the asteroids are about a half-mile (780 meters) and 525 feet (160 meters) in diameter, respectively. They are located about 0.6 miles (1 kilometer) from each other.

This graphic illustrates the major elements of the DART mission, showing the spacecraft’s approach and collision with asteroid Dimorphos, while the Italian LICIACube ridealong satellite and ground-based telescopes observe the impact. Credit: NASA/Johns Hopkins University APL

Experts estimate there should be around 25,000 near-Earth asteroids the size of Dimorphos. An asteroid of that size that impacts Earth could wipe out a metropolitan area, causing mass casualties.

NASA says surveys have discovered around 40% of similar-sized near-Earth asteroids. Scientists have found more than 95% of the population of larger 1-kilometer-class (0.6-mile) near-Earth asteroids, which could wreak global damage if they hit our planet. The percentage is much lower for the smaller asteroids, but they pose a more limited risk.

The $330 million DART mission is the first project by NASA’s Planetary Defense Coordination Office, set up in 2016 to help detect, track, and potentially defend Earth against potentially hazardous asteroids.

NASA plans to launch its second planetary defense mission, an infrared telescope and follow-on to DART, in the late 2020s to find most of the undetected dangerous near-Earth asteroids.

“We’re not aware of a single object right now within the next 100 years or so that is really threatening the Earth,” said Thomas Zurbuchen, head of NASA’s science mission directorate. “But I’ll also guarantee to you that if you wait long enough, there will be an object.”

“Our work right now with the DART mission is one possibility of what we might do if we found an asteroid on an impact course with the Earth,” said Lindley Johnson, NASA’s planetary defense officer, before the mission launched last year. “So we’re testing this kinetic impactor technique, where we just ram a spacecraft into the asteroid at high velocity to shave a little bit of speed off of its path, and that changes into the future.”

A small speed adjustment could result in large changes in the asteroid’s location years or decades into the future, meaning that with enough warning, a relatively compact spacecraft could be all that is needed to safeguard Earth from an impact.

“Our objective is to find these objects far way in time and far away from Earth, and to be able to enact this change in their orbit many years in advance, so it doesn’t take much to change them at all,” Johnson said.

“This demonstration will start to add tools to our toolbox of methods that could be used in the future, and we need several of them because the circumstances that we might face could be quite different,” Johnson said. ”

The most effective deflection method would depend on the size of a potentially threatening asteroid, along with its orbit and when it might hit Earth,

“Some of the other things that have been studied are what we call a gravity tractor, which is just taking a spacecraft and station keeping with the asteroid and using nature’s tug rope, gravity, the mutual attraction between the spacecraft and the asteroid will slowly tug that asteroid out of its impacting trajectory into a more benign one,” Johnson said. “Of course a technique like that takes longer to implement, so we would have to have more warning time to be able to implement it.”

Other options include ion beam deflection, where an ion engine could fire particles into an asteroid to gradually push it off course. And there’s the more violet nuclear option, which could involve a detonation near the asteroid.

The kinetic impact technique will be put to the test Monday. In order for it work, the DART mission fuses military-grade missile defense guidance technology to help the spacecraft home in on its asteroid target. And then scientists are ready with ground-based telescopes and space-based observatories — including the James Webb Space Telescope — to watch the sky for signs that DART hit the faint asteroid, then measure how the collision altered the trajectory of Dimorphos.

Scientists predict the impact will change the speed of Dimorphos around its companion Didymos by about 1%, likely reducing the time it takes to complete one orbit from 11 hours and 55 minutes to around 11 hours and 45 minutes. But the DART experiment will try to confirm those estimates, and it could take several weeks for scientists to precisely measure the orbit change.

The DART spacecraft itself won’t be around for that phase of the mission. The probe will be destroyed as it slams into Dimorphos, but will downlink near-real time images from its navigation camera at a rate of one frame per second until the impact.

Radar observations from Arecibo Observatory in 2003 showed the shape of asteroid Didymos, but little detail about its companion Dimorphos. Credit: Arecibo Observatory/NASA

The spacecraft’s Didymos Reconnaissance and Asteroid Camera for Optical navigation, or DRACO, imaging system, will take pictures of the Didymos and Dimorphos asteroids just before impact, collecting information on the asteroids’ locations to help DART navigate toward an aim point at the center of Dimorphos.

The final phase of the approach Monday will play out quickly. DART’s on-board computer will take control around four hours before impact, using sophisticated on-board navigation algorithms derived from missile guidance systems, called Small-body Maneuvering Autonomous Real Time Navigation, or SMART Nav.

The corrections needed to guide DART in toward Dimorphos will be too fast for mission control to command, and there will be a 38-second communication delay from the asteroid’s location to Earth, a distance of around 6.8 million miles (11 million kilometers).

Twelve hydrazine-fueled thrusters will steer DART on its final collision course.

DART will stream live video back to Earth from its DRACO cameras. Because of the high-speed approach and the small size of Dimorphos, the target asteroid will only be revealed in DRACO’s view finder in the final 60 to 90 minutes before impact. Didymos, somewhat larger than Dimorphos, is already resolved by DART’s DRACO camera.

About 50 minutes before impact, with SMART Nav at the wheel, DART’s navigation system will start to adjust its target from Didymos to Dimorphos.

“That’s a very sweaty time for us,” said Evan Smith, deputy mission systems engineer for DART at the Applied Physics Laboratory. “We have a lot of contingencies built right around that 50-minute transition and we’re going to be watching the telemetry like hawks, very scared but excited.

“And then from there, at 20 minutes to impact, we’re going to something called precision lock, where we totally ignore Didymos and we just go for Dimorphos only,” Smith said. “We expect to be thrusting quite a bit at that period. At two-and-a-half minutes to impact, we cut off all thrusting and we’re going to coast in.

“We’re going be streaming images the whole time, so images are coming in through DRACO, through our avionics and right out of the radio,” Smith said.

DART’s data handling system is designed to capture pictures, process them, and then downlink them to Earth in about 2 seconds, ensuring that the final image received on Earth will be taken just before impact. With the processing time on the spacecraft and the ground, coupled with the 38-second light travel time from DART back to Earth, the imagery received on the ground will be displayed with a lag of about 45 seconds behind real time, according to Elena Adams, DART’s mission systems engineer at APL.

Going into Monday’s approach, scientists know little about the shape of Dimorphos, which was discovered with a ground-based telescope in 2003. Didymos, the larger asteroid of the pair, was discovered in 1996, and scientists have some basic knowledge of its shape, thanks to radar observations.

“At about four minutes out … we’re finally starting to see the shape of Dimorphos, and then in four minutes we slam into it,” Adams said. “So there’s really not much time to react, and we’ve got to be right the first time.”

“It’s going to start off as a little point of light, and then eventually it’s going to zoom in and fill the entire field of view,” said Nancy Chabot, a planetary scientist at APL who is coordinating telescopic observations of DART’s impact and its aftermath.

The DART spacecraft released a small ride along spacecraft called LICIACube on Sept. 11. The stowaway spacecraft was provided by the Italian Space Agency, and is about the size of a small briefcase. It will fly a few minutes behind DART and attempt to capture images of the impact before sailing past Dimorphos at a range of around 34 miles (55 kilometers).

LICIACube’s images won’t come down live. They will be downlinked back to Earth slowly over the days following DART’s impact.

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/N48jShm
via World Space Info

Hurricane Ian prompts NASA to move Artemis moon rocket back to its hangar

NASA’s crawler transporter moves into position near pad 39B on Saturday to prepare for the rollback of the Artemis 1 moon rocket to the Vehicle Assembly Building. Credit: NASA/Joel Kowsky

Faced with threatening weather from Hurricane Ian, NASA managers decided Monday to haul the $4.1 billion Artemis 1 rocket off its launch pad and back to the protection of the agency’s Vehicle Assembly Building, likely ending any chance of launching the unpiloted moonshot before November.

NASA said in a blog post the decision was made “after additional data gathered overnight did not show improving expected conditions for the Kennedy Space Center area. The decision allows time for employees to address the needs of their families and protect the integrated rocket and spacecraft system.”

After two launch scrubs August 29 and September 3 due to hydrogen leaks and other issues, NASA carried out on-pad repairs and targeted a third attempt for Tuesday. But then-Tropical Storm Ian forced NASA to pass that up in favor of a backup opportunity October 2.

Over the weekend, NASA managers monitored the strengthening storm while engineers began rollback preparations, but a final decision was put off until Monday in hopes the forecast would improve enough to preserve the backup launch opportunity. Early Monday, those hopes were dashed, with forecasters predicting torrential rain, lightning and high winds in Brevard County later this week.

The decision was the latest in a series of setbacks for the 330-foot-tall rocket, the most powerful ever built for NASA and the linchpin in the agency’s Artemis moon program.

The goal of the initial test flight is to send an unpiloted Orion crew capsule on a long flight around the moon and then to test its heat shield during a hellish high-speed plunge back into the atmosphere at the end of the mission.

Because of the ever-changing positions of Earth and moon, the rocket can only be launched during specific periods when lighting and a variety of other factors are favorable. The current launch period, No. 26, closes October 4. Launch period 27 runs from October 17 through the 31st.

But because of the time needed to roll back to the VAB, service batteries in the rocket’s self-destruct system and then to haul it back out to the pad, re-connect propellant, power, data lines and other systems, NASA almost certainly will be forced to target launch period 28, which runs from November 12 to 27, for the next launch attempt.



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/bZDULmM
via World Space Info

Sunday 25 September 2022

Delta 4-Heavy rocket deploys spy satellite on final planned mission from ‘Slick Six’ launch pad

EDITOR’S NOTE: Updated Sept. 25 with satellite sightings and radio signal detections.

ULA’s Delta 4-Heavy rocket climbs away from Space Launch Complex 6 at Vandenberg Space Force Base to begin the NROL-91 mission Saturday. Credit: Brian Sandoval / Spaceflight Now

United Launch Alliance sent a triple-core Delta 4-Heavy with a top secret U.S. government spy satellite into orbit Saturday from California’s Central Coast, closing out a chapter in the tangled history of a launch pad originally built to support military astronaut missions on Titan rockets and space shuttles.

The spy satellite on-board the Delta 4-Heavy is owned by the National Reconnaissance Office, which discloses few details about its spacecraft. The circumstances of the launch Saturday — its launch site, rocket configuration, and flight track after liftoff — led independent analysts to conclude the Delta 4 likely carried a high-resolution electro-optical surveillance satellite into orbit.

Two more Delta 4-Heavy rockets are left in ULA’s inventory for launches in 2023 and 2024 from Cape Canaveral as the company transitions to the next-generation Vulcan Centaur rocket, the replacement for the Atlas and Delta launcher families that date back to the dawn of the Space Age.

The Atlas 5 and Delta 4 rockets currently flown by ULA show little resemblance to their forebears, but the names are steeped in history. Saturday’s launch from Vandenberg Space Force Base was the 95th and final flight of a Delta rocket from the military spaceport about 140 miles (225 kilometers) northwest of Los Angeles, and the 387th launch overall of a rocket bearing the Delta name.

It was the 10th launch of a Delta 4 rocket — and the fifth in the Delta 4-Heavy configuration — from Space Launch Complex 6, a picturesque launch site nestled on a hillside bluff overlooking the Pacific Ocean. The sprawling launch pad, known as SLC-6 or “Slick Six,” faces an uncertain future after the last Delta 4 flight from the site Saturday. The Space Force, which owns the pad and leased it to ULA, doesn’t yet have another tenant lined up to take over the facility.

“For us, seeing the last Delta launch from Vandenberg is bittersweet, for sure. We’re sorry to see it go,” said Col. Bryan Titus, vice commander of Space Launch Delta 30, the unit in charge of Vandenberg Space Force Base and the Western Range.

Three Aerojet Rocketdyne RS-68A main engines roared to life in the final seconds of Saturday’s countdown at SLC-6, sending a plume of red-hot exhaust out each side of the flame trench under the pad. After a staggered start sequence, the hydrogen-fueled engines powered the 233-foot-tall (71-meter) Delta 4-Heavy off the pad at 3:25:30 p.m. PDT (6:25:30 p.m. EDT; 2225:30 GMT).

Ten seconds later, the rocket vectored thrust from its main engines to steer south-southeast from Vandenberg, taking an arcing trajectory over the Pacific Ocean riding 2.1 million pounds of thrust. The rocket broke the sound barrier in about 80 seconds as the RS-68A engines on the Delta 4-Heavy’s side boosters operated at full throttle, while the center engine throttled back to conserve fuel for the first few minutes of the flight.

The engines burned 5,000 pounds of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen propellants each second, quickly burning through the 450,000 gallons of cryogenic fluids loaded into the Delta 4-Heavy’s three orange common booster cores during the countdown.

The side boosters shut down their engines and separated from the core stage about 4 minutes into the flight, heading for uncontrolled splashdowns in the Pacific a few hundred miles downrange from Vandenberg. The core stage then throttled up its RS-68A engine to burn for another minute-and-a-half before separation from the Delta 4’s cryogenic upper stage, which did the rest of the work to place the top secret spy payload into orbit.

A Delta 4-Heavy rocket emerges from behind a hill a few seconds after liftoff Saturday from Vandenberg Space Force Base, California. Credit: United Launch Alliance

The upper stage ignited its RL10 engine and released its clamshell-like payload fairing a few seconds later, and ULA ended its live coverage of the mission. The remainder of the flight occurred in a government-ordered news blackout.

The NRO and ULA issued press releases a little more than two hours after liftoff, confirming a successful conclusion to the launch, officially designated NROL-91.

“The Delta 4-Heavy has proven to be an integral part of the NRO’s history, helping us build the architecture for the world’s best space-based intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance,” said Chris Scolese, director of the NRO. “As our agency and the aerospace industry continue to innovate and evolve, we will explore new vehicles for launching payloads even more efficiently and effectively, with even greater capacity, agility, speed, and resilience. We are excited about the new technologies and partnerships that will define our next chapter.”

The NRO has flown payloads on 15 Delta 4 missions to date. The final two Delta 4-Heavy rockets set for launch from Cape Canaveral in 2023 and 2024 will also loft classified NRO satellites.

NRO satellites collect optical and radar imagery, intercept radio transmissions, and gather other intelligence data for U.S. government leaders, deployed military forces, and intelligence agencies.

“We like to say we’re the nation’s eyes and ears in space,” said Space Force Col. Chad Davis, director of the NRO’s Office of Space Launch. “So we provide that capability for our warfighters, allied and U.S., for our national decision makers to put them in the best spot they possibly can to either make decisions or execute what they need to on the battlefield.”

Satellite trackers using publicly-available information on the Delta 4 rocket’s flight track after liftoff predicted the mission would place its payload into an orbit less than 250 miles (400 kilometers) above Earth, and at an orbital inclination of 73.6 degrees to the equator. It turned out the prediction was close to the mark.

Sky watchers spotted the satellite from the NROL-91 mission in the skies over the Netherlands early Sunday. Scott Tilley and Cees Bassa, both radio astronomers, also detected encrypted radio transmissions from the satellite, suggesting the spacecraft was healthy and in the expected orbit after launch.

The NROL-91 mission likely deployed a sister satellite to a payload launched on a Delta 4-Heavy rocket on the NRO’s NROL-71 mission in January 2019. Both satellites launched into similar orbits. Seasoned trackers of spy satellites believe the NROL-71 and NROL-91 missions launched the first members of a new generation of Keyhole, or KH-11, optical reconnaissance satellites.

But previous KH-11 satellites launched into sun-synchronous polar orbits, at a different inclination than the 73.6-degree orbits achieved on the NROL-71 and NROL-91 missions. A Delta 4-Heavy launch from Vandenberg last year — between NROL-71 and NROL-91 — deployed its NRO payload into a more conventional sun-synchronous orbit, which is tailored for regular, repeatable observations of strategic sites, military installations and other targets of interest to U.S. intelligence agencies.

The KH-11 satellites are essentially bus-sized telescopes peering down on Earth, with primary mirrors measuring 7.9 feet (2.4 meters) across, the same size as the mirror on the Hubble Space Telescope. The ultra-sharp, very-high-resolution imagery produced by such satellites is believed to be unparalleled, and the spy craft relay their observations to the ground via the NRO’s dedicated network of communications satellites.

The NRO’s patch for the NROL-91 mission. Credit: National Reconnaissance Office

Delta 4-Heavy missions from California in 2011 and 2013 deployed gap-filler KH-11-type satellites to continue supplying the government with reconnaissance imagery after the NRO canceled a contract with Boeing for a replacement line of optical imaging craft as part of the Future Imagery Architecture program. Keyhole satellites before 2011 launched on Titan rockets from Vandenberg.

The NRO eventually selected Lockheed Martin — the same company that built the past generation of KH-11 satellites — to construct at least two new-generation spacecraft, introducing new technology and other upgrades into the spy satellite constellation.

The new electro-optical surveillance satellites, sometimes called KH-11 Block 5, have the same 2.4-meter mirror diameter as the earlier Keyhole-type Earth-imaging platforms, according to past public statements by government officials.

The launches of NROL-71 and NROL-91 into an orbit at a different inclination than the KH-11 satellites customarily fly caused some spy satellite observers to consider whether those missions carried a different kind of NRO payload, such as a radar imager. But without clear evidence otherwise, the consensus remains that NROL-71 and NROL-91 most likely delivered KH-11-type optical telescopes to orbit.

There are no other known hefty satellites in the NRO’s pipeline that require the Delta 4-Heavy’s lift capability. The Delta 4-Heavy can deliver payloads up to 62,540 pounds (28.3 metric tons) to low Earth orbit, making the Delta 4-Heavy the most powerful rocket in ULA’s fleet, one of the most powerful operational launchers in the world.

Saturday’s launch was the the 43rd Delta 4 flight overall, and the 14th in the Delta 4-Heavy configuration, created by combining three expendable hydrogen-fueled booster cores together to haul the military and NRO’s most massive payloads into orbit. The Delta 4-Heavy is the most powerful rocket in ULA’s current fleet, and the largest rocket to ever launch from California.

“The National Reconnaissance Office puts absolutely exquisite capabilities on orbit,” Davis said. “And the natural extension to that is the Delta 4-Heavy is used for some of those even most exquisite and most sensitive kinds of capabilities that I wish we could share with the broader community. But that’s part of the idea, is that people don’t know that we can do the kinds of things that we can do in space, and that vehicle is just part and parcel to those absolutely exquisite capabilities on orbit delivering for this nation.”

After retirement of the Delta 4-Heavy, the NRO’s heaviest payloads will launch on SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy rocket or ULA’s Vulcan. Both are less expensive than the Delta 4-Heavy, which is priced at more than $400 million per mission.

SPACE FORCE LOOKING FOR NEW TENANTS AT SLC-6

Built among hills that hide the pad from public view, the SLC-6 launch pad was originally constructed to support flights of military astronauts and NASA space shuttles.

The Air Force developed the SLC-6 launch site in the 1960s for the Manned Orbiting Laboratory program. Pentagon officials envisioned launching military astronauts on top of Titan rockets for orbital spy missions, but was canceled in 1969 before any launches from the SLC-6 pad.

NASA and the Air Force agreed in the 1970s to launch space shuttles from SLC-6, allowing astronauts to conduct military missions and deploy spy satellites in polar orbit. The space shuttle Enterprise, used for ground demonstrations and atmospheric test flights, was stacked on the SLC-6 launch with external tank and solid rocket booster test articles for fit checks in early 1985.

But the Air Force abandoned plans to launch military space shuttle flights from Vandenberg in the wake of the Challenger accident in 1986, and the shuttle-era buildings at the SLC-6 site sat mothballed for years. Lockheed Martin used the SLC-6 pad for four launches of its light-class Athena rockets in the 1990s, but those missions didn’t utilize much of the shuttle-era infrastructure at the site.

The space shuttle Enterprise at Space Launch Complex 6 for fit checks in 1985. Credit: U.S. Air Force

Boeing took over the SLC-6 pad and modified the shuttle infrastructure for the Delta 4 rocket, which first launched there in June 2006. ULA was formed later in 2006 by the merger of Boeing’s Delta and Lockheed Martin’s Atlas rocket programs. SLC-6 hosted its first launch of the triple-core Delta 4-Heavy rocket configuration in January 2011.

Read our 2011 story detailing the history of the SLC-6 launch pad, written just before the first Delta 4-Heavy flight from Vandenberg.

SLC-6 is iconic here,” Titus said. “It’s legendary. It’s kind of what people think about when they think about Vandenberg. It’s had many lives. It started in the mid 1960s. They were going to support something called the Manned Orbiting Laboratory. In the ’70s and ’80s, it was built up for a shuttle program, and they ended up not going down that path. And then in the ’90s and 2000s, we started going down this path of launching Deltas from there, and we’ve had mission success after mission success out of that place for the last almost 20 years.

Northrop Grumman planned to use the SLC-6 launch pad for its now-canceled OmegA rocket, which the company proposed to the Pentagon in a competition for military launch contracts. But the Defense Department selected ULA’s Vulcan rocket and SpaceX’s Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launchers in 2020 for eligibility to compete for military launches scheduled through 2027.

Northrop Grumman shut down development of the OmegA rocket after losing the military launch procurement.

And now ULA will leave SLC-6 after the final Delta 4-Heavy launch from the West Coast spaceport.

“SLC-6 has done us well,” Titus said. “I think that everyone here at Vandenberg has a warm spot in their heart for that place, and we’re going to make sure that it’s continued to be utilized. What we don’t know is exactly what that’s going to look like. But I can say that, first of all, we’re working closely with ULA to make sure that we have a smooth transition. And secondly, there are many other launch service providers out there that could find utility in that location. There’s a lot of infrastructure there. So I’m fairly confident that it will be utilized. We just don’t know exactly how yet.”

ULA’s other launch pad at Vandenberg, Space Launch Complex 3-East, will be converted to support flights of the new Vulcan Centaur rocket in the next few days. SLC-3E is currently used to launch Atlas 5 rockets, and the final Atlas 5 flight from Vandenberg is scheduled for Nov. 1.

Like the Delta rocket family, the Atlas 5 will be retired in the coming years for replacement by the Vulcan. The final Atlas 5 missions will be based out of Cape Canaveral.

Wentz said ULA chose the SLC-3E launch pad for the Vulcan rocket over SLC-6 for a few reasons. One was the similarity between the Atlas 5 rocket and the Vulcan, which both use Centaur upper stages, the same payload shroud design, and the same type of solid rocket boosters.

Another reason was that SLC-6 is more costly to maintain, and ULA is seeking to reduce costs to compete with SpaceX for military launch contracts. SLC-6 has the largest footprint of any launch site at Vandenberg, and is on a similar scale to NASA’s two Apollo-era launch pads at Kennedy Space Center — pads 39A and 39B.

This wide view of SLC-6 shows the pad’s Mobile Service Tower at right, surrounding and protecting the Delta 4-Heavy rocket before launch on the NROL-91 mission. The Mobile Assembly Shelter, originally built for the space shuttle, is at center with the U.S. flag. Credit: Stephen Clark / Spaceflight Now

SLC-6 has a 325-foot-tall Mobile Service Tower used to help stack and protect rockets on the pad, a structure originally built for the Manned Orbiting Laboratory program. There’s also a 270-foot-tall Mobile Assembly Shelter that dates back to the 1980s for space shuttle missions. Both buildings move on rail tracks.

Wentz said ULA will “safe and secure” the launch pad after the final Delta 4-Heavy launch Saturday, ensuring that all hazardous systems to sit in an “idle condition” until officials decide what to do next with SLC-6.

There are no immediate plans to demolish any of the structures at SLC-6, and ULA will turn over responsibility for the pad back to the Space Force, which will try to find a new tenant for the pad. Until then, officials don’t expect any significant changes to the site.

ULA will not lay off any of its workforce at Vandenberg, Wentz said. Instead, the workers will transition to ready for the final Atlas 5 launch at the West Coast spaceport, then prep for Vulcan missions.

“From a workforce perspective, the team is upbeat,” Wentz said. “There’s no concern about their future. We’re not in a position where we’re stepping down and going to have to lay off folks. So there are folks that are sticking around to launch these vehicles.”

Startup launch companies like Firefly Aerospace and Relativity Space have signed agreements with the Space Force to fly their small satellite boosters from Vandenberg. SpaceX currently leases a launch pad at Vandenberg for Falcon 9 rocket missions, and ULA will continue using SLC-3 for the Atlas 5 and Vulcan rockets. Another small launch pad, SLC-8, has at least one more space launch on its schedule — a Northrop Grumman Minotaur 4 rocket set to take off in 2023.

“The way that I think we envision this working is that once we identify who’s interested in taking over SLC-6, then we’ll work with them to understand what they want to do in order to facilitate launching whatever type of booster they have,” Titus said.

“Once we identify who it’s going to be, we’ll probably look at the current state of the infrastructure, identify some things that I think would be value-added, maybe some things that don’t need to be there anymore, and then that company will probably go through the same process tat ULA went through 15 or 20 years ago when they took a pad that was designed for the space shuttle, and converted it to a pad that supports a Delta launch vehicle,” Titus said.

“So it’s really going to be up to the commercial provider to decide what changes they want to make, but we’ll be there to support and enable that in any way possible.”

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.



from Spaceflight Now https://ift.tt/0YEc1f9
via World Space Info